By: Jiesper Pedersen
“The most hectic COP since Paris”, said the Kenyan delegation last week. Several promising things evolved from the COP26 climate summit in Glasgow. But a 29-year conflict remains unsolved, which is a key to entering the 1.5 °C pathway.
On the positive side, the COP agreement expresses global consensus about the scientific facts affirming that man-made global climate change exists. This creates a more straightforward foundation for future negotiations compared to the last 29 years of negotiations with a built-in skepticism established by the fossil energy industry. And for the first time, fossil fuels are mentioned in a COP agreement – the importance of removing (inefficient) state subsidies for fossil fuels. In the final minutes, around 9 pm Glasgow time, there was great dissatisfaction with India’s late announcement of not wanting to phase out (but phase down) coal plants without CO2 capture. Previously, the language was “weakened”, as it is called in COP slang, by not dealing with all coal and coal power plants – with or without carbon capture. The third semi-uplifting thing about the agreement is that all countries must strengthen their ambitions to reduce greenhouse gases.
Continuar a ler